All other factors was mostly produced by established scales, with the text translated and slightly adjusted to fit all of our test

Apart from intention to date, every details within studies was indeed mentioned into the an effective Likert measure from a single (completely disagree) in order to eight (totally concur). Intention up until now was mentioned using one binary sure/no matter: “I would like to carry on a night out together with this particular individual”. The new study’s separate variable is understood character text creativity, that was counted towards product “So it reputation text seems unique in my experience”.

All the about three mediation details of research are mentioned by two activities. Thought intelligence is mentioned toward circumstances “I do believe this individual makes sense/intelligent” (considering ; Pearson’s r = .83), imagined love of life for the facts “In my opinion this person possess laughs/try funny” (adopting the ; Pearson’s r = .82), and you can observed oddness was measured with the activities “I believe this person is strange/peculiar” (adopting the [39,40]; Pearson’s roentgen = .77).

The results details of attractiveness was basically measured that have about three affairs, for each covering some other measurement out-of detected appeal: physical elegance (“I do believe this person is good-looking”), social elegance (“I believe this individual is actually type”; ), and close attractiveness (“I will be seduced by this individual”; ).

Mathematical study.

All participants who rated at least one dating profile from the full set of 308 profiles were included in the dataset, with a maximum of five profiles (M = 2.95, SD = 1.50). In total, 775 participants (62.8%) viewed and assessed the maximum of five profiles. Seven participants who did not want to indicate their sexual preference, were presented with a total of ten profiles of which five were from men and five from women. This together resulted in 4289 individual profile assessments. The 308 texts differed in the number of times they were rated, ranging between 7 and 20 ratings per text (M = , SD = 2.56). With the irrNA package in R , intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC; 1,k) were calculated for all eight impression formation variables, providing an indication of the internal consistency of the scores given to the different texts by the different participants. All ICC’s were between .66 and .85 (ICCindicate = .80; see file ICC Scores on OSF for further details), indicating a good reliability between scores given by participants . Consequently, data was aggregated on text level and mean scores were calculated for each of the variables. For dating intention, which was measured with a dichotomous yes/no question, the text mean score ranged between 0 and 1, with higher scores indicating more willingness to date the profile owner.

To evaluate the fresh new mediation hypotheses, i used design 4 of the Process v3.step one macro into the SPSS with good bootstrapping strategy that have ten,100 products and you may 95% Monte Carlo rely on periods. Brand new independent changeable is actually the fresh new sensed profile text creativity rating. Detected bodily, societal and you will close appeal and you may relationship intention had been the latest mainly based details, and you can understood intelligence, sense of humor, and you will oddness this new mediating details. The content fundamental this particular article arrive towards the OSF, at:


Before conducting mediation analyses, a multivariate regression model revealed that perceived text originality significantly predicted all seven mediating and outcome variables, F(7, 300) = , p p 2 = .671. Table 2 provides all mean scores, standard deviations, and correlation scores of perceived text originality scores and the mediating and outcomes variables. To check on potential differences in the assessments between the members of 50PlusMatch and Pepper, we also run analyses of the 50PlusMatch and Pepper participants separately. As similar results were found, the results reported are those with the participant group as a whole. Moreover, results of the mediation analyses were similar when word count was included as a control variable, hence the results without word count as control variable are presented.

468 ad

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *